Biotechnology Students Learn To Control Insect Cyborgs
Students work with insect cyborgs.
June 13, 2016
Ashlee Junier ’16 held Teddy the cockroach gently in her hands, letting him wander
over her fingers.
"Their feet are kind of sticky," she said.
But Teddy is no ordinary cockroach. Junier and her classmates turned him and a few
of his fellow roaches into cyborgs that follow the students’ commands.
The idea was hatched by Rosemary Whelan, coordinator of the biology and genetics and
biotechnology programs at UNH, as a way to give her biotechnology class some real-life
experience with an emerging field of research.
Insect cyborgs have become a promising arena for scientists. Groups such as the Defense
Advanced Research Projects Agency have been exploring their potential in disasters,
rescues and reconnaissance. Other groups are using similar methods to study the insects
themselves.
Whelan said one of the main benefits to using small animals is that they generate
their own power.
"A fly uses its own energy," she said. "It’s almost impossible to manufacture robots
with small enough batteries that can do what they do."
The class used kits supplied by the resource website Backyard Brains that consisted
of circuit board "backpacks," LED lights, small lithium batteries and electrodes and,
of course, several adult members of Blaberus discoidalis, a one-and-a-half-inch species
native to Central America.
The first step to creating the cyborgs was to do surgery on the roaches. The class
broke into groups, each of which tag-teamed a roach. The backpacks were inserted with
a small hole poked just behind their heads. Then their antennae were clipped, and
the electrode wires were fed into them.
The backpacks are Bluetooth enabled, allowing a smartphone app to send a signal directly
to one antenna or the other. The signals essentially mimic what the roach would feel
if it brushed up against a wall, telling it to "turn left" or "turn right."
Junier, a Dartmouth, Mass., native majoring in forensic science, pre-medicine and
biotechnology, was glad that her group’s experiment with Teddy went well. They posted
video of Teddy scurrying around, changing direction at their command.
There were some challenges along the way. Nadine Lebek ’17, a forensic science, genetics
and biotechnology major from Massapequa Park, N.Y., had to overcome the "ick factor"
for the project.
"I hate bugs," she said.
But even Lebek saw value in what they did. Whelan guided the class through an extensive
discussion on the ethics of working with animals prior to the project and proceeded
only after everyone agreed it was worthwhile.
"The roaches probably weren’t thrilled," Lebek said. "But it’s important to understand
how this works."
Dylan Stenlake ’16, a biology and forensic science major from Pen Argyl, Penn., said
one of the wires in the antennae came out of his group’s roach, breaking the connection.
That didn’t stymie his enthusiasm, though. "The one that worked I thought was really
cool," he said.
Stenlake eventually wants to be a teacher, and said he appreciates these kinds of
hands-on experiences. "I think that interactive projects like these are something
that more teachers should incorporate into their classes," he said.