At the University of New Haven, the health and safety of all members of our community remain our top priority. We have reimagined life at the University to help deliver high-quality education in as safe an environment as possible.
This website provides updated information about our response to the pandemic and our ongoing efforts to prevent the spread of COVID-19, and is being continually updated throughout the Spring 2021 semester.
It appears that with widespread availability of several highly effective COVID-19 vaccines, we can now see a light at the end of the tunnel. To that end, we have spent considerable time planning for the Fall 2021 semester.
We are looking forward to being able to return to many of our pre-pandemic norms in terms of class formats, student life, and other staples of the University of New Haven experience.
Professor’s Groundbreaking Work Helps Set Free Man Wrongly Convicted of Murder
The lead forensic DNA consultant on the case of a Texas man who spent nearly a decade in prison for a crime he did not commit, Angie Ambers, Ph.D., says the cutting-edge DNA technology she applied to set him free could lead to many more people who have been wrongly convicted being released from prison.
May 7, 2020
By Renee Chmiel, Office of Marketing and Communications
Her lecture proved to be a foreshadowing, of sorts, for a case that she and Ware would later collaborate on.
The lead forensic DNA consultant on the case, Dr. Ambers, an associate professor of forensic science at the University of New Haven and assistant director of the Henry C. Lee Institute of Forensic Science, used a cutting-edge software program to reexamine the DNA evidence in the case – something that, she says, has increasingly been used in criminal casework instead of turning to human analysts.
“In the past, different qualified DNA analysts could independently review the same DNA mixture and arrive at a different conclusion,” she explains. “This could ultimately result in a wrongful conviction or, alternatively, a false exclusion and acquittal, and it prompted experts to seek a more objective methodology.”
Companies can screen DNA mixtures and determine whether or not a suspect’s DNA is present. Dr. Ambers worked with Cybergenetics, the developer of the leading software program TrueAllele, submitting a DNA mixture that contained Scheerhoorn’s DNA, as well as that of another male. The analysis found alleles that did not match Scheerhoorn nor Grant.
After deducing the profile of the unknown DNA contributor, they worked with a crime lab in South Carolina to search the profile against the Combined DNA Index System (CODIS), an FBI database. They found a match: The DNA profile belonged to an Atlanta man, Jermarico Carter who has a lengthy criminal record, and has since confessed to Scheerhoorn’s murder.
“The use of a probabilistic genotyping software's findings in CODIS is significant,” explained Dr. Ambers. “This case was the first time it was attempted because an independent party – the Innocence Project of Texas – requested it, as opposed to law enforcement.”
“The entire reason the Innocence Project of Texas was able to get Lydell Grant, a completely innocent man, exonerated was because of the cutting-edge forensic analysis and the work of Dr. Angie Ambers,” added Ware. “She conceptualized what needed to be done with the DNA mixture and put the plan into action.
“She understood probabilistic genotyping and knew the right people to reach out to,” he continued. “Her work was brilliant. The result was that Mr. Grant was able to walk out of prison, where he was serving a life sentence, and the actual perpetrator of this murder was identified, arrested, and charged, and has actually confessed.”
Now awaiting official exoneration, Grant has maintained his innocence. Dr. Ambers says that the technology that set him free could be a game changer.
“The technology used in Lydell Grant’s appeal has enormous potential to solve cold cases and lead to reevaluations of prior convictions that were based on using the older, more traditional approach,” said Dr. Ambers. “I continue to provide expert consultation to the Innocence Project because I believe in fairness and justice.”